Germany Debates: Is the New Defense Minister Boris Pistorius Really the Right Person for the Job? He is considered robust and assertive, but a mistake would have nearly fatal consequences.
Munich – Right now it is Defense Minister Boris Pistorius started, but this story could already fall on his feet. It was 2018, shortly after the big flight to Germany. But the migration crisis remained omnipresent because the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, Bamf for short, made some fatal mistakes. In the end, boss Jutta Cordt had to doff her hat, the then Interior Minister Horst Seehofer had taken action.
The office came under fire because the Bremen branch is said to have granted many people illegal asylum. Boris Pistorius, then Minister of the Interior of Lower Saxony, had information about it, but for mysterious reasons he did not use it. The case made national headlines at the time. Can this old process now catch up with the new secretary of defense? A recent query from IPPEN.MEDIA’s Munich Merkur left Boris Pistorius unanswered.
Today Pistorius is Federal Minister of Defence, he was sworn in on Thursday. Following the resignation of Christine Lambrecht (How much money does he receive from the state?) of the Lower Saxony Ministry of the Interior. He is considered robust and assertive. “One of the best,” says SPD colleague Katarina Barley, FDP vice-president Wolfgang Kubicki already sees him as “the last shot of Olaf Scholz”, and the chancellor praised the choice. his most important minister at the moment in it ukrainian war: “Boris Pistorius is not only a friend and a good politician, he also has great experience in security policy.”
Defense Minister Appointed Pistorius: When an explosive email suddenly disappeared in the Bamf scandal
Pistorius should not allow himself a breakdown like five years ago in Hannover. Cause Facebook and text that dem Munich Mercury by IPPEN.MEDIA since thenshowed that the then Minister of the Interior of Lower Saxony, Pistorius, was already aware of the irregularities and suspicions of fraud against the then head of the BAMF branch in Bremen in the summer of 2017.
Michaela Engelmeier, who was part of the SPD national board at the time, had verbally drawn his attention to the complaints in the Bamf because a Bamf employee she knew denounced a “security risk” in the authority and raised the alarm. : “If this is known, the interior minister (de Maizière ed.) has to go and Merkel has a big problem.” Pistorius requested an email from the Bamf employee and promised to take care of the matter. His spokesman confirmed receipt of the email email on June 26, 2017: Since Pistorius was on vacation at the time, he forwarded this email to his office as usual that same evening.”Unfortunately, due to regular deletions, it is currently not possible to trace to which part of the ministry was this email,” the additional information reads. A bitter oversight.
Asked about it again by Engelmeier in May 2018, shortly after the irregularities surrounding the asylum authority became known, Pistorius simply replied: “No, this is not the case discussed.” , but he announced that he found it particularly annoying since it was such a delicate matter. Such a breakdown had never occurred in his office before. He himself had forgotten the mail after the holidays, says Pistorius.
Pistorius and the Bamf-Mail: three questions remain unanswered
The explosive: The oversight occurred just months before the 2017 federal election, after the result of which Pistorius should have had legitimate hopes for the federal Interior Minister post, if the SPD had won the election with its candidate Martin Schulz.
Also spicy: According to the leader of the FDP parliamentary group, Stefan Birkner, Pistorius did not try to restore the emails via TI Lower Saxony. “It is surprising that the Office of the Minister seems to be suffering from collective amnesia. This also raises the question of whether the country’s security is in good hands with Boris Pistorius,” Birkner said loudly. cup.
A third point is suspicious: Pistorius must have been aware of the Bremen case. Already in September 2016, he himself sent an internal letter to the then head of Bamf, Frank-Jürgen Weise. Pistorius raised “fundamental questions about cooperation” with the Bremen branch. He also emphasized the urgency of his concern. Why he and his ministry so underestimated the case just a few months later remains a mystery. “Why should I have kept something like that from myself during the federal election campaign?” Pistorius asked at the time. Mercury-Conversation. To this day he has not responded. As Federal Minister of Defence, he sits on the ejection seat of the cabinet.such sloppy work should not be repeated there.